Related Post

3 Comments Received

xyz
November 3rd, 2010 @9:05 pm  

I would be willing to guess that the reason that the statistics showed a 60% reduction is that it was impossible to take accurate statistics, in other words, the survey was horribly biased. No one in their right mind would have honestly answered. How could you have known that the survey takers weren’t undercover cops?

someone
November 14th, 2010 @10:08 pm  

The Netherlands

Proponents of legalization almost certainly would cite Amsterdam as the drug Mecca of the Western world. Anyone may go into the restaurants in this city and order marijuana and hash from a menu; further, heroin and cocaine have been decriminalized for all practical purposes. The police simply leave the users alone. Consequently, health officials estimate that Amsterdam has 7,000 addicts, 20% of whom are foreigners. These addicts are responsible for 80% of all property crime in the city, thus necessitating that Amsterdam maintain a police presence far greater than those of cities of comparable size in the United States.

Bill Hoover
November 14th, 2010 @10:14 pm  

The idea that the drug addict is not harming anyone but himself is fallacious. Drug use leads to mental and physical problems which cause the addict to become a burden on the state. They will also lead to child neglect, inability to work and manic states which may cause the addict to become violent to others.
We already see similar things with alcohol, a perfectly legal substance.
Ron Paul’s logic is flawed for once.

Leave A Reply

Please Note: Comments may take a moment to appear.