Related Post

3 Comments Received

Beekla
May 24th, 2008 @4:17 pm  

Actually you are not robbing Peter to pay Paul. That’s just non-sequitor rhetoric. What you are doing is taking from everyone (Peter and Paul) and giving to everyone (peter and Paul). Gravel also expressed one of the most fundamental and basic criticisms of libertarianism, the wholesale rejection of the social contract.

Jackson
May 24th, 2008 @11:27 pm  

Under a majority rules system (like Gravel says he wants) 51 percent can use government coercion to take from the other 49 percent. Just because they say it is for “healthcare” doesn’t make it right.

Under your theory of the social contract, there is no limit to what a majority can decide they want to do to everyone (or how much in taxes they want to take from everyone) for the sake of what they think is best. That is pretty much the opposite of libertarianism.

enlighted1
June 16th, 2008 @6:38 pm  

Wow… you are a douche bag. Sory was that too harsh. I think not.

RON PAUL IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN A REAL LIBERTARIAN. EVER. PERIOD END OF STORY.

I CAN CITE CHAPTER AND VERSE ON THE SUBJECT.

RULE 1

DISCRIMINATION OF ANY PERSONS IS NOT A LIBERTARIAN IDEA. NOR IS GIVING THE RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE TO THE STATE.

You’re not even worth the energy it takes to type. So…

Leave A Reply

Please Note: Comments may take a moment to appear.