Related Post

3 Comments Received

November 10th, 2009 @3:46 pm  

Almost two years ago, I was a neo-con. Then got exposed to the Ron Paul virus and became a Libertarian, but I’m getting more radical as time goes by. Murray Rothbard sounds better and better each time I read him.

anon
November 20th, 2009 @5:49 pm  

i am confused by the use of the term anarchist in this context as i thought it really only applied to libertarian socialists

January 30th, 2010 @5:17 pm  

As the self-proclaimed father of libertarianism throughout the sixties and seventies, Murray Rothbard perhaps bears the most responsibility for marginilizing the once great classical liberal movement. By allying with the 60’s Radical New Left, violent leftist militias, and other Leninists, Rothbard diluted the libertarian brand and made it virtually impossible for free-market conservatives to embrace Rothbard’s brand of libertarianism. Anarcho-capitalism is a philosophy wholly outside the great classical liberal tradition, a cornerstone of which is the Rule of Law. Anarchy, whether anarcho-capitalism, anarcho-syndicism, or anarcho-socialism, subjects men to mob rule and perpetual chaos. It is inconsistent with freedom and with capitalism. Peter Schwartz does a great job explaining the terrible folly of anarcho-capitalism in his essay “Libertarianism: The Perversion of Liberty”

Leave A Reply

Please Note: Comments may take a moment to appear.